Philosophy of Life and Death: Philosophy and Euthanasia

Friday, September 6, 2019

Philosophy and Euthanasia




Philosophy and Euthanasia 


Definitions of Euthanasia:


The word euthanasia translates from Greek roots as "good death." The Oxford English Dictionary states that the original meaning, "a gentle and easy death," has evolved to mean "the actions of inducing a gentle and easy death." This definition is consistent with contemporary use of the term. For example, the Canadian Senate Special Committee on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide defined euthanasia as "the deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending the life of another person in order to relieve that person's suffering where that act is the cause of death".


Types of Euthanasia:


1- Voluntary euthanasia: Euthanasia is considered to be voluntary when the patient wishes to die, and expresses this wish. An example of voluntary euthanasia is when a physician gives a lethal injection to a patient who is competent and suffering, at that patient's request. 


2- Involuntary euthanasia: Euthanasia is considered to be involuntary when the patient does not wish to die, but this wish is ignored. An example of involuntary euthanasia is when a son gives a lethal overdose of medication to his father who is suffering from cancer, but the father does not want the overdose. 


3- Non-voluntary euthanasia: Euthanasia is considered to be non-voluntary when the patient is unconscious, or in no position to express a wish. An example of non-voluntary euthanasia is when a doctor gives a lethal injection to an incompetent elderly man who is suffering greatly from an advanced terminal disease, but who did not make his wishes known to the physician when he was competent. 


Arguments in Favour of Euthanasia:


Arguments in favour of euthanasia are generally based upon beliefs concerning individual liberty, what constitutes a "good" or "appropriate" death, and certain life situations that are considered unacceptable. 


The good death. According to this view, certain ways of dying are better than others. Usually a good death is described ideally as drifting into death in a pleasing environment as one falls asleep. The ancient Roman orator and statesman Cicero said that a good death is the ideal way of respecting natural law and public order by departing from the earth with dignity and tranquility. Euthanasia can be seen as a way to assure that a person dies in a dignified and appropriate manner.


Individual liberty. In his Essay on Suicide, the eighteenth century Scottish philosopher David Hume stated that all individuals in a free society should be able to choose the manner of their death. Some people, for example, feel that this right must be tempered by the obligation to not cause harm to others.


Arguments against Euthanasia:


The arguments against euthanasia include religious and ethical beliefs about the sanctity of life as well as a number of arguments allowing for euthanasia that will inevitably lead to a situation where some individuals will risk having their deaths hastened against their will.


Sanctity of human life. This belief, based upon religious values, considers human life sacred and inviolable. No person may take the life of another. For example, St. Augustine interpreted the biblical prescript against killing as being absolute, even including the taking of one's own life. Another argument for the sanctity of human life is that this constitutes one of the pillars of social order that must be maintained to avoid social breakdown. For example, St. Thomas Aquinas condemned suicide because it goes against one's obligation to oneself, the community, and God.


The value of suffering. Suffering may be seen as good for the soul, a heroic act, or the price to pay for one's sins in order to guarantee a better life in the hereafter. Jesus' suffering on the cross may be considered an example of an appropriate way to die. If suffering is admirable, then seeking to end suffering by euthanasia cannot be condoned.


The impossibility of competent and rational decision making. The seventeenth century philosopher Spinoza felt that the desire to survive is such an essential part of human nature that humans may not rationally prefer not to survive and kill themselves. According to this view, anyone who wants to die may not be acting rationally.

No comments:

Post a Comment